Constitution Annotated

Fifteenth Amendment — Right of Citizens to Vote

Fifteenth Amendment

The right of citizens of the United States to vote shall not be denied or abridged by the United States or by any State on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude–The Congress shall have the power to enforce this article by appropriate legislation.

Amdt15.1 Overview of Fifteenth Amendment, Right of Citizens to Vote

The Fifteenth Amendment is the last of the three Civil War Amendments,1 adopted in response to the end of the American Civil War with the intent to grant the federal government additional powers to address the lingering remnants of slavery.2 The Fifteenth Amendment addresses the right of suffrage,3 providing in Section 1 that the right of U.S. citizens to vote may not be abridged by the government “on account of race, color, or previous condition of servitude.”4 The Supreme Court recognized as early as 1872 that although the Civil War and responsive Amendments may have been primarily focused on “African slavery,” the protections granted by that text were not limited to those “of African descent.”5 Describing this provision simply shortly after its adoption, the Supreme Court said “[i]f citizens of one race having certain qualifications are permitted by law to vote, those of another having the same qualifications must be.”6 The Court early on also struck down a state law that, although it contained “no word of discrimination on account of race or color,” had the effect of “inherently” making a prior condition of servitude “the controlling and dominant test of the right of suffrage.”7

Unlike the guarantees in the original Bill of Rights, the Fifteenth Amendment expressly constrains both “the United States” and “any State” from abridging these rights.8 The Fifteenth Amendment, with the other Civil War Amendments, thus helped to “fundamentally alter[ ]” the “balance of the pressures of localism and nationalism” by making “civil rights a national concern.”9 Further, while Section 1’s prohibitions are “self-executing,”10 Section 2 of the Fifteenth Amendment gives Congress the additional power to pass laws to enforce this guarantee.11 As the Supreme Court explained in a 2009 opinion, “[t]he first century of congressional enforcement of the Amendment, however, can only be regarded as a failure.”12 Although federal laws were adopted to enforce the Amendment shortly after ratification, enforcement was “spotty and ineffective,”13 and ultimately those early laws were “repealed with the rise of Jim Crow.”14 Finally, Congress adopted the Voting Rights Act of 1965, discussed in more detail in a subsequent essay.15

Notes
  1. See Intro.3.4 Civil War Amendments (Thirteenth, Fourteenth, and Fifteenth Amendments). These are sometimes also known as the Reconstruction Amendments. ↩
  2. See, e.g., Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. 36, 67–68, 71 (1872). ↩
  3. See id. at 71 (noting that former slaves were “denied the right of suffrage” even after the abolishment of the institution of slavery). ↩
  4. U.S. CONST. amdt. XV, § 1. ↩
  5. Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S. at 71–72. See also Rice v. Cayetano, 528 U.S. 495, 499 (2000) (holding that a law limiting the right to vote for certain state trustees to “Hawaiians” violated the Fifteenth Amendment); id. at 512 (saying the Amendment “goes beyond” its original objective and “grants protection to all persons, not just members of a particular race”). ↩
  6. United States v. Reese, 92 U.S. 214, 218 (1875). ↩
  7. Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347, 364–65 (1915). This case is discussed in Amdt15.S1.2 Grandfather Clauses. ↩
  8. U.S. CONST. amdt. XV, § 1. ↩
  9. Younger v. Harris, 401 U.S. 37, 61 (1971) (Douglas, J., dissenting); see also Richmond v. J.A. Croson Co., 488 U.S. 469, 490 (1989) (plurality opinion) (“The Civil War Amendments themselves worked a dramatic change in the balance between congressional and state power over matters of race.”). ↩
  10. Guinn v. United States, 238 U.S. 347, 363 (1915). ↩
  11. U.S. CONST. amdt. XV, § 1. ↩
  12. Nw. Austin Mun. Util. Dist. No. One v. Holder, 557 U.S. 193, 197 (2009). ↩
  13. See South Carolina v. Katzenbach, 383 U.S. 301, 310 (1966) (discussing the Enforcement Act of 1870). ↩
  14. Nw. Austin, 557 U.S. at 197. ↩
  15. Amdt15.S2.2 Federal Remedial Legislation. ↩

Amdt15.2 Historical Background on Fifteenth Amendment

In the second session of the Thirty-ninth Congress, Congress extended the right to vote to African American men by statute in the District of Columbia and the territories, and in the seceded states, as a condition of readmission, the states had to guarantee Black men suffrage.1 Following the election of President Ulysses S. Grant, the “lame duck” third session of the Fortieth Congress passed the amendment on February 26, 1869, and sent the proposed Fifteenth Amendment to the states for ratification. The struggle was intense because Congress was divided into roughly three factions: those who opposed any federal constitutional guarantee of Black male suffrage, those who wanted to go beyond a limited guarantee and enact universal male suffrage, including abolition of all educational and property-holding tests, and those who wanted or who were willing to settle for an amendment merely proscribing racial qualifications in determining who could vote under any other standards the states wished to have.2 The latter group ultimately prevailed, and the Fifteenth Amendment was ratified by the states on February 3, 1870.3

Notes
  1. W. GILLETTE, THE RIGHT TO VOTE: POLITICS AND THE PASSAGE OF THE FIFTEENTH AMENDMENT 29–31 (1965); Act of Jan. 8, 1867, ch. 6, 14 Stat. 375 (District of Columbia); Act of Jan. 25, 1867, ch. 15, 14 Stat. 379 (territories); Act of Feb. 9, 1867, ch. 36, 14 Stat. 391 (admission of Nebraska to statehood upon condition of guaranteeing against racial qualifications in voting); Act of Mar. 2, 1867, ch. 153, 14 Stat. 428 (First Reconstruction Act). ↩
  2. GILLETTE, supra note 1, at 46–78. The congressional debate is set forth at 1 B. SCHWARTZ, STATUTORY HISTORY OF THE UNITED STATES: CIVIL RIGHTS 372 (1971) ↩
  3. See Amdt14.S2.1 Overview of Apportionment of Representation. The Equal Protection Clause has been extensively used by the Court to protect the right to vote. See Amdt14.S1.8.6.1 Voting Rights Generally. ↩